Table 5.9 Sensitivity Analysis - Impact of Inventory Holding Costs

Origin Destination Commodity Parcel Size

(tonnes)

Land

Mode

Cost

(Rs. /

tonne)

Load Port Disport

Multimodal

Cost

(Rs. /

tonne)

Viable

VSPL Tondiarpet Sponge Iron 2700 Rail 699 Vizag Chennai 792 NO

VSPL Tondiarpet Pig Iron 16000 Rail 741 Vizag Chennai 633 YES

Kakinada Palghat Food Grains 6000 Rail 657 Kakinada Cochin 681 NO

Tughalakabad

Tondiarpet Food Grains 16000 Rail 1013 Kandla Chennai 952 YES

Tughalakabad

Whitefield Containers 6300

(350 TEUs)

Rail 1389 Kandla Cochin

1734 NO

Jamshedpur

Bangalore Containers 3600

(250 TEUs)

Road 3095 Kolkata Chennai

3109 NO

Banglore Trivandrum Containers 3600

(250 TEUs)

Road 1553 Mangalore Vizinham

1914 NO

Chapter 5: Economics of Cargo Diversion to Coastal Shipping

5 - 16

Impact of social costs

Similarly the social costs to the land modes of transport were not taken into account in the

analysis. Having added the inventory holding costs to the land + sea mode, the social costs

need to be added to the land modes.

If we apply social costs at a meager 0.15P/tkm to rail freight and 0.50P/tkm to road freight

the impact on diversion would be as shown in Table 5.10.

Table 5.10 Sensitivity Analysis - Impact of Social Costs

Origin Destination Commodity Parcel Size

(tonnes)

Land

Mode

Cost

(Rs. /

tonne)

Load Port Disport

Multimodal

Cost

(Rs. /

tonne)

Viable

VSPL Tondiarpet Sponge Iron 2700 Rail 699 Vizag Chennai 792 YES

VSPL Tondiarpet Pig Iron 16000 Rail 741 Vizag Chennai 633 YES

Kakinada Palghat Food Grains 6000 Rail 657 Kakinada Cochin 681 YES

Tughalakabad

Tondiarpet Food Grains 16000 Rail 1013 Kandla Chennai 952 YES

Tughalakabad

Whitefield Containers 6300

(350 TEUs)

Rail 1389 Kandla Cochin

1734 YES

Jamshedpur

Bangalore Containers 3600

(250 TEUs)

Road 3095 Kolkata Chennai

3109 YES

Banglore Trivandrum Containers 3600

(250 TEUs)

Road 1553 Mangalore Vizinham

1914 YES

5.5.3 Summary

Sea transport offers several advantages in terms reduction of costs, decongestion of road &

rail networks, savings on fuel consumption etc, but additional handling at load and discharge

ports lead to longer transit time. The land based transport networks have over 25,000 Origin-

Destination (O-D) pairs between major production and distribution / consumption centers

spread across the country. For the purpose of analysis O-D pairs were selected on the basis of

some criteria like type of cargo, location, proximity to seaports, land leads and sea distances

etc.

The case studies reveal that the handling costs and charter hire costs are major contributors to

the sea transportation cost. Handling costs range from 35% to 50% and charter hire

contributes 20% to 33%. Port dues and other port charges constitute around 10% to 20%.

The bunker cost varies from 13% to 30% depending on length of sea voyage

The viability analysis revealed that diversion was found viable in 68% of the cases. On

applying the recommended measures of reduction of handling costs, port charges and bunker

costs and accounting for return cargo availability 83% of cases became viable.

Chapter 5: Economics of Cargo Diversion to Coastal Shipping

5 - 17

On taking into account indirect costs such as inventory holding costs (in the land + sea mode)

and social costs (in the land modes), it was observed that diversion to land + sea mode

became viable in all the cases (100%) supporting diversion to coastal shipping.

It can be inferred that coastal shipping can integrate with other modes of transport and offer a

better and alternate option with economic advantages.

All the above case studies involved one load port and one discharge port and a return to the

load port on ballast, a typical situation that exists today. But with the development of coastal

shipping & minor ports, a different scenario may emerge where a vessel may call at more

than one port en-route to its destination port and may load/discharge cargo at more than one

port on the return leg also. Such voyages with multiple ports of call would make the

economics of coastal shipping even more attractive.

Encouraging operators to introduce liner services between select ports would also help

develop coastal trade. Voyages with multiple ports of call and availability of liner service

would further enhance the flexibility of the coastal shipping. This flexibility of the coastal

shipping would encourage the shippers to opt for the sea route.

Considering the advantages of Coastal Shipping, it is essential to provide certain incentives to

the trade to promote coastal shipping.

In the present chapter, though very selected O-D pairs were considered for analysis, there

could be several other O-D pairs that may be viable to move in multi-modal environment.

However, lack of proper information about these movements limits the analysis and estimates

for diversion to sea movement. Coastal shipping is highly dependent on the culture of intermodal

movements. In the absence of proper and latest database, it is difficult to plan for the

multi-modalism in India. With an objective to promote inter-modal movement in a coordinated

and economical manner, it is essential to initiate a recording mechanism and

consolidation of the recorded information to plan for optimum transportation of goods.

6 - 1

Mailto:kris@dgshipping.com