CHAPTER 3

COASTAL CARGO PROFILE

3.1 REVIEW OF TRENDS AND PATTERNS

The total traffic handled at all ports for 2002-03 was 418 million tonnes (MT) with

coastal traffic accounting for 116 MT or about 28 percent of total traffic handled at all

ports. Out of 116 MT, 84 MT was handled at major ports, 22 MT at Gujarat Maritime

Board (GMB) ports, and 10 MT at non - GMB ports. The coastal cargo carried over long

distances was mostly bulk and captive cargo with general cargo accounting for share of

less than one percent. The details of share of coastal cargo at major and minor ports are

given in Table 3.1.

Table 3.1 Share of Coastal Cargo at Major and Minor Ports

Share of Coastal Cargo: 2002-03(in ' 000 tonnes)

Major Ports Coastal Total %age Coastal

Ennore 8485 8485 100.0

Paradip 12201 23901 51.0

Tuticorin 5654 13294 42.5

Visakhapatnam 17089 46006 37.1

Cochin 4716 13001 36.3

Mumbai 8744 26796 32.6

Haldia Dock Complex 7229 28603 25.3

Chennai 6830 33686 20.3

New Mangalore 4161 21430 19.4

Kolkata Dock System 1234 7201 17.1

Kandla 4329 40633 10.7

J.L. Nehru 2192 26844 8.2

Mormugao 1193 23649 5.0

Total 84107 313529 26.8

Share of Coastal Cargo: 2001-02 Minor Ports (in ' 000 tonnes)

GMB 19390 79710 24.3

Non GMB 7870 15420 51.0

Total 27260 95130 28.6

Selected GMB Ports

Magdalla 5127 8314 61.7

Muldwarka 1573 3260 48.3

GPPL 698 1561 44.7

Jaffrabad 1704 4036 42.2

Sikka 7835 47465 16.5

Selected Non GMB Ports

Rawa 2440 2440 100.0

Ulwa-Belapur 716 716 100.0

Revdanda 559 618 90.5

Dhramtar 1623 2455 66.1

Panaji 718 2858 25.1

Chapter 3: Coastal Cargo Profile

3 - 2

Major ports handled 73 percent of coastal cargo. Crude, POL and coal accounted for 90

percent of traffic handled. Minor ports handled 27 percent of coastal cargo - POL,

cement, building material and iron ore accounted for 90 percent of the traffic handled at

minor ports.

The GMB ports of Sikka, Magdalla, Jafrabad, Muldwarka and GPPL handled more than

90 percent of the coastal traffic handled in Gujarat and 72 percent traffic handled at all

minor ports.

Non-GMB ports such as Rawa, Dharamtar, Ulwa-Belapur, Revdanda, and Panaji handled

more than 75 percent of the cargo handled at non-GMB Ports and 28 percent of the total

cargo handled at all minor ports.

Port-wise data from Table 3.1 shows that in the year 2002-03 Vizag, Paradip, Mumbai,

Ennore and Haldia handled more than 64 percent of the coastal cargo serviced at all major

ports. The share of coastal cargo with respect to total cargo was highest at Ennore

followed by Paradip, Tuticorin, Vizag and Cochin and was more than 35 percent, while at

Mormugao, JNPT and Kandla, it was less than 11 percent. The impact of coastal cargo in

different ports was kept in view while determining the attractiveness and suitability of

ports for servicing coastal traffic. The coastal cargo serviced at minor ports was mostly

captive. The time series data shows that the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of

coastal traffic is about 4.5 percent per year at major ports, 20 percent at non-major ports

during the last 10 years. The CAGR for non-GMB ports is at 6.5 percent per year and the

growth at GMB ports has shown a sharp increase from 6.3 MTPA in 1998 to 22 MTPA in

2001-02.

Figure 3.1: Trend analysis

3.2 COASTAL CARGO PROFILE

Out of the 108 MT coastal traffic handled (54.0 MT of originating traffic) during 2001-

02, 16.4 MT was accounted for by POL products 16.2 MT for thermal coal, 10.2 MT for

crude, 4.7 MT for iron ore and pellets, 3.7 MT for cement, clinker and building material

and 2.8 MT for others. The originating coastal traffic during 2002-03 was 58 MT.

Trend Analysis - Major and Minor Ports

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

300.0

350.0

19

91-

92

19

92-

93

19

93-

94

19

94-

95

19

95-

96

19

96-

97

19

97-

98

19

98-

99

19

99-

00

20

00-

01

20

01-

02

Year

MT

PA

Major Overseas

Major Coastal

Major Total

Non-major Overseas

Non-major Coastal

Non-major Total 4.52

7.04

6.26

21.8

20.0

22.6

Chapter 3: Coastal Cargo Profile

3 - 3

Table 3.2 Coastal Traffic Profile: 2001-02

Commodities Quantity

(million tonnes)

Percentage

POL Products 16.4 30

Thermal Coal 16.2 30

Crude 10.2 19

Iron ore and Pellets 4.7 9

Cement & Clinker 3.7 7

Others 2.8 5

Total 54 100

Source: Basic Ports Statistics, 2001-02

Figure 3.2a: Coastal Commodity Profile: Major Ports

Figure 3.2b: Coastal Commodity Profile: Minor Ports

3.2 COASTAL ROUTES

The major coastal cargo flows are as follows:

a. POL products - originating at major ports and at Sikka with sources being

Jamnagar, New Mangalore, Mumbai, Cochin, Paradip, Vizag, Chennai and

Haldia, where refineries are situated. The key destinations are Vizag, Kandla,

Haldia and Mumbai, which also have refineries, seems to be using their capacity

for distribution by land.

Coastal Commodity Profile - Major Ports

Others

3% Cement

2%

Iron Ore/Pellets

6%

Pol Products

24%

Coal

39%

POLCrude

26%

Coal

POLCrude

Pol Products

Iron Ore/Pellets

Others

Cement

Coastal Commodity Profile - Non - Major Ports

Bldg. Material *

22%

Pol Products

50%

Iron Ore

18%

Others

5%

Iron & Steel

2%

Coal

2% Chemical

1%

Pol Products

Bldg. Material *

Iron Ore

Others

Coal

Iron & Steel

Chemical

Chapter 3: Coastal Cargo Profile

3 - 4

b. Thermal coal - originating ports are Paradip, Vizag, Haldia and the discharge ports

are Chennai, Tuticorin. This traffic is driven by Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

(TNEB).

c. Crude oil - originating ports are Mumbai, Rawa and PY-03 and the discharge

ports are to Vizag, Cochin, Chennai and Kandla. This traffic is driven by

petroleum companies such as IOCL, BPCL, HPCL, and CPCL.

d. Iron ore and pellets originating ports are Vizag and Mormugao and the discharge

ports are Magdalla, Dhramtar and Revdanda. This traffic is driven by Essar,

Nippon-Denro and Vikram Ispat.

e. Cement originating ports are Muldwarka, Porbunder, Jafarabad, Pipavav and

discharge ports are Dharmtar, Ulwa Belapur, JNP, Ratnagiri, Magdalla, New

Mangalore Cochin. This traffic is driven by companies like Gujarat Ambuja, L &

T, and Saurashtra cements.

f. Iron & steel is moving from Magdalla (Essar Steel) to Mumbai and GPPL.

The commodities movements are generally from port to port, however in case of

POL, there are criss-cross movements. The movement patterns for major coastal

commodities are given in Figures 3.3 to 3.8. The origin-destination patterns of the

movements of coastal commodity are given in Table 3.3 to 3.9.

Table 3.3:Coastal Cargo Movement in Million Tonnes 2001-02: Coal

TO

Ennore

Chennai

Tuticorin

Total Haldia -

-

2.9 2.9

Paradip 3.4 3.4 1.9 8.7

Vizag - 3.9 0.4 4.3

FROM

Total 3.4 7.3 5.2 15.9

Table 3.4:Coastal Cargo Movement in Million Tonnes 2001-02: Cement

TO

New

Mangalore

Cochin

JNPT

Ulwa

Belapur

Total

Mul Dwarka 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.7 2.0

FROM Total 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.7 2.0

Chapter 3: Coastal Cargo Profile

3 - 5

Mailto:kris@dgshipping.com