CHAPTER 2

COASTAL SHIPPING PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES

In order to avoid any ambiguity about the definition of coastal shipping it would be

appropriate to refer to its widely accepted definition.

“Coastal shipping is the movement of cargo by sea between ports in India, not including

the non-contiguous island trades.” Movement of passengers is not within the ambit of this

study.

2.1 ADVANTAGES OF COASTAL SHIPPING

This mode has some inherent advantages over the other modes such as road and rail. It is

energy efficient, environment friendly and has potential to reduce congestion on rail and

road networks and can cater to movement of large volumes of bulk traffic at relatively

cheaper cost. The advantages of coastal shipping vis - a - vis other modes of transport are

as below.

Fuel Consumption

Fuel consumption by coastal shipping at 4.83 gm/tkm is just 15 percent of consumption

by road and 54 percent of that by rail (Table2.1).

Table 2.1 Mode-wise Fuel Consumption

Mode Fuel consumption (gm/tkm)

Road 31.330

Rail 8.911

Coastal shipping 4.828

Source: EU: Progress Report on Short Sea Shipping: 1999

Emissions

Emissions of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon, particulates and nitrogen

oxides are very much lower in the case of coastal shipping than in road or rail. Sulphur

dioxide emissions are however, more for coastal shipping. (Table 2.2).

Table 2.2 Emissions by Various Modes of Transport

Emission (gm/tkm). Mode

CO2 CO HC Particulates Nox SO2

Road 98.301 0.479 0.227 0.078 0.978 0.031

Rail 28.338 0.196 0.098 0.027 0.472 0.036

Coastal shipping 15.45 0.036 0.012 0.006 0.311 0.290

Source: EU: Progress Report on Short Sea Shipping: 1999

Cost of Carriage

The cost of carriage of goods by coastal shipping works out to be 21 percent of the cost

by road and 42 percent of cost by rail. (Table 2.3).

Chapter 2: Coastal Shipping Problems and Perspectives

2 - 2

Table 2.3 Cost of Carriage by Various Modes.

Mode Cost of carriage / tkm (1000 km lead)

Road Rs. 1.20

Rail Rs. 0.60

Coastal Shipping Rs. 0.25

Source: timesb2b.com April, 2002

External Costs

External costs of water transport are also significantly lower compared to rail or road.

These costs arise out of accidents, noise pollution, air pollution, climate changes,

infrastructure burden and congestion. In the EU, the marginal costs of water transport

have been estimated at 20.7 percent and 40.5 percent of road and rail respectively (Table

2.4).

Table 2.4 External Cost Comparison for various Modes.

Mode EU: Marginal External Cost (Euro / 1000 tkm)

Road 24.12

Rail 12.55

Water 5.00

Source: Inland Navigation Europe, Brussels: Promotional Literature: 2000

Evidently coastal shipping is a viable, economical and relatively cleaner mode of

transport, which merits optimal patronage.

2.2 GLOBAL TRENDS

Many other countries are making optimal use of coastal waters for transport. In the

European Union, for example, coastal shipping has an enviable 43 percent modal share in

tkm, which is set to increase further (Table 2.5).

Table 2.5 Modal Share – European Union Countries

Mode EU – Modal share by tkm (%)

Road 42

Rail 10

Inland water way 5

Coastal shipping 43

Source: EU- Progress Report on Short Sea Shipping: 1999

It bears mention here in terms of total tonnes transported, as opposed to tkm; the share of

coastal shipping in the EU is only 6 percent (Table 2.6). This is because the average

distance over which a tonne of cargo is transported by coastal ship is much higher at 1385

km than for other modes.

Table 2.6 Mode-wise Average Distance Transported

Chapter 2: Coastal Shipping Problems and Perspectives

2 - 3

Mode EU – Average distance (km) transported per tonne

Road 100

Rail 300

Inland water way 270

Coastal shipping 1385

Source: EU- Progress Report on Short Sea Shipping: 1999

2.3 INDIAN SCENARIO

India’s 7517 km long coastline makes it an ideal resource for development of coastal

shipping. Presently its modal share is small (Table 2.7).

Table 2.7 India: Modal Share by Tonne-kilometer

Mode Modal Share (%)

Road 54

Rail 34

Inland waterways < 1

Pipeline 4

Coastal shipping 7

Source: Consultants estimates

While the Indian overseas fleet registered 1173 percent growth in numbers from 1951 to

2003, the coastal fleet inched upwards in the corresponding period to 209 percent. (Table

2.8).

Table 2.8 Growth of Overseas and Coastal Vessels

India – Fleet Size (Numbers) Vessels 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2003

Overseas 15 68 212 310 243 217 191

Coastal 79 104 62 65 74 233 244

Source: Directorate General of Shipping

In GRT terms, however, coastal fleet shows dismal growth. While overseas fleet grew by

3256 percent between 1951 to 2003, the coastal fleet increased by just 172 percent

(Table2.9).

Table 2.9 Growth of Overseas and Coastal Gross Registered Tonnage

India – Fleet Size (million GRT) Vessels

1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2003

Overseas 0.16 0.50 2.87 5.24 5.35 6.09 5.37

Coastal 0.22 0.36 0.22 0.30 0.40 0.58 0.60

Source: Directorate General of Shipping

Indian Coastal Fleet

Further analysis shows that if its 244 vessels as on March 31, 2003, as many as 149 were

non-cargo carrying vessels, reducing the effective cargo carrying fleet to 95 vessels of

0.43 million GRT. (Table 2.10).

Chapter 2: Coastal Shipping Problems and Perspectives

2 - 4

Table 2.10 Composition of Coastal Fleet in India

Type of Vessel Number Gross

Registered

Tonnage

Cargo Carriers

Dry Cargo 69 103615

Dry Cargo (Bulk Carriers) 9 226388

Tankers (Product Carriers) 12 40776

Tankers (Crude Oil Carriers) 2 50080

Ehtylene Gas Carriers 3 8727

Sub total 95 429586

Non Cargo Carriers

Tugs 99 24101

Passenger-cum-Cargo 16 71669

Passenger Vessels 17 4389

Ro-Ro Vessels 1 956

Dredgers 16 71055

Sub total 149 172170

Total 244 601756

Source: Directorate General of Shipping (as on March 31, 2003)

It is often said that the index of the coastal shipping industry health lies in the amount of

general cargo carried. By this yardstick, coastal shipping fares poorly, with general cargo

movement of less than 1 percent.

Age Profile of Coastal Fleet

To make matters worse, the coastal fleet is old with as many as 65 percent of the cargo

vessels over 15 years old (Table 2.11).

Table 2.11 Age Profile of Indian Coastal Fleet as on 2003

Vessel Age Group Cargo Non-Cargo Total

5 years & below 10 35 45

6 – 10 years 14 26 40

11 – 15 years 19 26 45

16 – 20 years 12 12 24

20 years & above 40 50 90

Total 95 149 244

Source: Directorate General of Shipping (as on March 31, 2003)

Mailto:kris@dgshipping.com